2 with 8. Sharing experience on how safe drinking water for 2 billion people is possible with Household Water Treatment and Safe storage (HWTS) at a cost of $8 billion.
MetaMeta Research
(
Private sector
)
Private sector
#SDGAction49822
Description
Description
CONTEXT
At least 2 billion people use a water source that is contaminated with faeces (WHO, 2022). Safe drinking water with water kiosks or piped systems cost at least $25 per capita for CapEx so reaching 2 billion people with these options would cost at least $50 billion. A much cheaper, be it intermediate, solution that makes water that people drink safe is HWTS as promoted by the WHO and UNICEF. Our initiative will share three decades of experience on both failures and success with HWTS and present “2 with 8”, a game changing approach to reach 2 billion people with HWTS at a cost of $8 billion. This idea was formulated at the 2022 Stockholm Water Week by a group of people guided by John Cherry, recipient of the 2020 Stockholm water prize.
HWTS
HWTS options include boiling, chlorine, UV and water filters. Over 80 HWTS products are documented by the organisation CAWST. (CAWST, 2021). The WHO tested products and over 30 comply with performance criteria for removal of turbidity and pathogens (WHO, 2022). Each option has its limitations. Boling cost fuel, Chlorine is eliminates bacteria and viruses but not cryptosporidium, a significant cause of child mortality. It also has a taste if not dosed exactly right. UV does not function with turbidity. Filters are expensive. However in Europe, America and Asia the filter market is booming and a proof that filters are market-based so a product that families are willing to pay for. Besides “inline filters” for piped systems there is a range of table top gravity filters that are attractive, effective and affordable with prices of $20 to $60 and filter capacity of 30 - 100 ltrs/day. Some models also remove viruses. If filters comply with the 3 Cs, (Correct, Consistent, Continuous use) and if combined with improved hygiene, they are very effective in reducing water borne diseases. (Wolf. 2018).
LESSONS LEARNED
Many HWTS projects failed. For instance in East Africa 900.000 filters were given for free but after some time most filters were not used anymore (IRC, 2011). Reasons include complicated maintenance and as a free gift there was limited ownership by the users. However increasingly there are successes. For example, in Ethiopia a local assembly of several models of household water filters started. High quality filter elements are imported and the plastic containers are produced locally. Cost of the cheapest model is $22 and over 300.000 were sold. NGOs give filters to poor families but also many families pay the full price. Interesting in Ethiopia is that a growing number of water utilities accept that they cannot always deliver safe water e.g. due to power cuts, so families have to store water. As an additional service these utilities now sell filters to customers and others (Foppen. 2019). The local production and actions with utilities were funded with aid money.
Expected Impact
2 WITH 8
The expected impact of presenting the idea “2 with 8” is to stimulate action! To show with evidence that with a 1 time grant of around $4 per person, a large part of the SDG.1 target group can have drinking water that is free from biological contamination and protozoa. In case of chemicals like Arsenic or fluor, an option is to collect rainwater just for drinking and use a filter.
Actions needed to reach 2 billion people include:
1. Awareness creation
Awareness that clear water can still be contaminated, that safe water reduces health related cost, or that a water filter can be paid with the cost of 6 months of bottled
water. Awareness needs to be nationwide and for 3 to 5 years on radio, television, social media. An example of such a campaign was in Cambodia. (IDE, 2018)
2. Supply chains
In each town there should be shops that sell 3 or more options, so people have a choice. Products should be government approved, comply with the 3Cs and be market-
based meaning that supply goes on without NGO or other support.
3. Payment systems
Micro credit, pay as you use, group credit. An example can be the Grameen bank
4. Subsidies for the poor
An estimated 1 billion people part of the target group of SDG6.1, are so poor that they need support. To avoid market distortion vouchers can be applied. With a voucher
of for instance $20 a family goes to the local shop, pay $3 and get a filter worth $23. If they want a filter that cost $33, they pay $13.
Households can be divided in those who:
A. can afford upfront payment
B. need payment in instalments
C. cannot pay the full price.
Subsidizing the bottom billion is expected to create a commercial supply chain of filters for group A and B and a supply chain for spare parts for all groups.
ORGANISATION
Realization requires cooperation of Governments, Private sector, NGOs and the Finance sector.
No single HWTS business can meet the needs of all these people so the producers of HWTS products could form an alliance similar to the solar light or cookstoves industry to build a dynamic, inclusive, and financially sustainable HWTS industry.
FUNDS
Funds needed to reach 2 billion people is an estimated $8 billion of which some $2 bln. is for awareness, $1 bln. for supply chains and $5 bln. for vouchers. (200 mln. filters @ $25/filter).
Funds could, should? come from parties interested in SDG6.1 and/ or SDGs for health (eg. stunting).
A promising (partial) funding source are carbon credits which can be used for awareness creation or supply chain development and in some cases to lower the retail price of a filter. The $8 billion can come from many donors. Governments and NGOs can start small with a village, later a region and if effective scale up to country level.
Partners
Nazava. Basic Water Needs. The Groundwater project, Aqua for All
Additional information
Websites of partners
https://gw-project.org/
https://aquaforall.org/project/aggregator-for-filter-sales-in-amhara-regionethiopia/
https://global.nazava.com/
https://www.basicwaterneeds.com/tulip-table-top/
https://washresources.cawst.org/en
References
• WHO. 2022 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water
• CAWST 2021. https://www.hwts.info/products-technologies).
• WHO testing scheme. https://www.who.int/tools/international-scheme-to-evaluate-household-water-treatment-technologies
• IRC. 2011 https://www.ircwash.org/news/kenya-western-province-lifestraws-carbon-water-program-bogus-says-kevin-starr
• Clasen. T. 2015. Cochrane study https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004794.pub3/full
• Brown. J. 2008. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23249863_Local_Drinking_Water_Filters_Reduce_Diarrheal_Disease_in_Cambodia
• Foppen. H. https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/084-201906foppenholtslagchekoltheutilityappr_002.pdf
• IDE Cambodia 2018. https://www.ideglobal.org/story/clean-water
• Wolf. J, Clasen,T, Bartram.J et al. 2018: Impact of drinking water, sanitation and handwashing with soap on childhood diarrhoeal disease: updated meta-analysis
and meta-regression. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29537671/
• General info. Heierli. U. 2010; “Marketing safe water systems”. www.poverty.ch
False
Feedback
Action Network

Timeline
01 February 2023 (start date)
31 December 2029 (date of completion)
Entity
MetaMeta Research
Region
- Africa
- Asia and Pacific
- Latin America and the Caribbean
Other beneficiaries
Direct: NGOs, others active in HWTS, Members of the HWTS network
The private sector (SMEs) in several countries who can be trained in the local assembly and sales of HWTS products with a focus on water filters.
Indirect: People who now drink water contaminated with faeces.
More information
Countries

Cameroon

Ethiopia

Ghana

Kenya

Malawi

Mozambique

Nicaragua

Niger

South Sudan
Global Action Plan

Zambia
Contact Information
Henk, mr